Condo Hotels

Some hoteliers are selling some hotel rooms like one would sell a condominium— thus, the name: condo hotel. Some are being built brand new, and others are being converted from old hotels, mostly in expensive vacation destinations — for now, most are in Florida.

Condo hotels differ from times shares or fractional ownership in that the owner of the condo hotel doesn't have to rent out the room, nor is there an obligation to use the hotel management, although if you want to rent, what other cost-effective option is there?

Because the buyer is actually buying real estate, there are real estate taxes, insurance, and a condo association fee, and condo hotels generally cost twice what an equivalent residential condo would cost. There is no common method for allocating other expenses of a hotel, such as a bar, convention facilities, or shops.

Buyers don't have to rent out their rooms, but if they do, they will be bound by the rental agreement. If the rooms are rented, then they must match others in the hotel. The owner could not use it during peak occupancy times, though an owner may not want to anyway since that will be the most profitable time to rent. Local ordinances may restrict the time an owner may occupy their room.

In a typical arrangement, the hotel operator takes 10% of the rental for operating the hotel, renting out the rooms, and cleaning, then the rest is split 50/50 between the condo hotel owner and the hotel.

Condo hotels have many drawbacks:

Condo hotels are not considered investments since they likely won't make money, but it is a way to own property in expensive locales with the rents helping to reduce ownership costs.

Historical Notes

Condo Hotels May Not be a Good Deal

Apr 8, 2008 - It seems that condo hotels are a lousy investment, at least for now, for those people who bought at the top of the real estate bubble. Hotels are a risky business because occupancy rates depends on the economy, weather, and competition. Condo hotels allowed developers to transfer some of their risk to investors of the condo units, which may have caused the developers to build more than they would have otherwise, adding too much capacity for an area.

Some investors are saying that the hotel keeps more of the rental money than they should. Other investors are arguing that since condo hotels were primarily an investment, they should have been registered with the SEC as securities, which would make it easier for investors to recoup some of their losses. If the investors could prove that the condo hotels should have been registered as securities, then they would be entitled to get their money back without having to prove fraud or misrepresentation. However, most developers did not promote the condo hotels as an investment, thereby obviating the need for SEC registration, thus defeating those investors suing to assert otherwise. Some are complaining to the SEC, but the SEC won't take any action unless the developer enticed buyers with projected incomes or occupancy rates.

Condo-Hotel Buyers See Investments Sour: https://www.realestatejournal.com/buysell/markettrends/20080408-lin.html (no longer available)