Trusts and the Rights of Beneficiary Creditors

Trusts have evolved as an instrument to not only give the settlor greater control over the disposition of his assets at death and to lower estate taxes, but also as a method to protect the trust income or principal from the creditors of the trust's beneficiaries. A creditor always has the right to attach income or property once it is transferred to the beneficiary and a creditor can get a court order that requires the trustee to pay the creditor instead of the beneficiary whenever a distribution is made to the beneficiary until the debt is paid. But whether the creditor can demand a distribution from the trust for payment of the beneficiary's debt depends on the terms of the trust.

If the beneficiary can demand a payment from a trust, then creditors of the beneficiary can also demand payment. For this reason, if the beneficiary of the trust is also the settlor of the trust, then creditors can reach the assets of the trust, since the settlor usually retains all rights to the trust's assets. It is also against public policy to allow the settlor to shield his own assets from creditors, while still benefiting from those assets, by putting them in a trust. Uniform Trust Code (UTC) §505

A mandatory trust is required to pay a set amount to its beneficiaries according to a formula specified in the trust document. With this type of distribution, the creditor can take the place of the beneficiary and receive the payment instead of the beneficiary until the debt is satisfied. However, ERISA, a federal law covering pension funds, does not allow claims against pension funds by creditors.

A discretionary trust allows the trustee the discretion of how to distribute the trust assets and to whom. A beneficiary of a discretionary trust has no property rights in the trust, so the beneficiary cannot demand payment from a discretionary trust unless the trustee has abused her discretion. Since a creditor of the beneficiary has no more rights to trust property than the beneficiary has, neither can the creditor demand payment.

Spendthrift and Support Trusts

Unless the trust document provides otherwise, a beneficiary can generally transfer his interest in a trust. If the beneficiary can voluntarily transfer his interest, then a creditor, through a court order, can force the beneficiary to transfer his interest to the creditor.

If the trust document has a spendthrift clause that prevents the beneficiary from transferring his interest in the trust to another—both voluntarily and involuntarily—then creditors cannot force a transfer of the beneficiary's interest to them. A trust cannot allow voluntary transfers but not involuntary transfers because it is against public policy, so, to be legally effective the spendthrift clause must prevent both voluntary and involuntary transfers. A spendthrift clause also has no legal effect to a mandatory trust, so a spendthrift trust is, by legal necessity, a discretionary trust. UTC §506

A spendthrift clause can apply to trust income or principal or both and it may only apply to particular beneficiaries. Spendthrift provisions may be effected by any of the following methods:

Some states prevent a creditor from attaching trust property at all, but some states restrict spendthrift provisions by:

Under bankruptcy, the bankruptcy trustee gains no more rights than the beneficiary. Hence, a spendthrift clause protects the trust's assets from being included in the bankruptcy estate. 11 U.S.C. § 541(c)(2)

A support trust is a special type of spendthrift trust in that the trust pays the beneficiary only enough, according to a formula in the trust document, for the support and the education of the beneficiary and nothing more; otherwise, a trust that pays more than necessary for support will not satisfy the legal requirements of a support trust and creditors will be able to reach it. However, creditors that provide basic support for the beneficiary can attach the beneficiary's interest in the trust.

Because a support trust is for the support of the beneficiary, the interest in the trust cannot be transferred, even if it is not explicitly stated in the trust document. Otherwise, how can the trust provide support?

While spendthrift and support clauses are effective against most creditors, the states and the courts, as a matter of public policy, have granted exceptions to priority creditors:

Domestic Asset Protection Trusts

As already stated, a settlor cannot protect his assets from creditors by transferring his assets to a trust where he is also a beneficiary. However, a few jurisdictions, including Alaska, Delaware, and Missouri, have allowed domestic asset protection trusts (DAPTs, aka self-settled asset protection trusts) as a means of attracting money to their jurisdictions.

The advantage of Alaskan trusts is that assets are protected from all creditors, if the assets were not fraudulently conveyed. By contrast, Delaware does not protect against claims from divorced spouses. Other states that have DAPT laws include: Nevada, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, and Tennessee.

For the DAPT to be effective, the grantor should be a resident of a DAPT state; otherwise, the state in which the trust is located may, under the U.S. Constitution, have to recognize a court judgment from another state.

Self-settled trusts in the United States have some general requirements:

Some DAPT states treat distributions to a DAPT as a completed gift, so the distribution is removed from grantor's estate. However, if the unified tax credit is used to exclude the gift to the trust, then any subsequent distributions to the grantor will be included in the estate, thus wasting the portion of the unified tax credit used offset the gift tax.

Any transfers of assets to self-settled trusts that were made to defraud creditors can be reversed as a fraudulent transfer under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. Note, also, that DAPTs have not been extensively tested against legal challenges, so it is questionable how effective they will be.

Foreign Asset Protection Trusts

A foreign trust can also be an effective means of protecting assets. Years ago, the wealthy hid much of their wealth in foreign accounts, such as Swiss bank accounts. Nowadays, United States (US) law requires that US citizens report any ownership interest in a foreign entity, if the value of the interest exceeds $50,000 by year-end or $75,000 at any time during the year. Foreign interests are reported on Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets and filed with the tax return. The tax penalty for failing to report foreign interests is steep: A $10,000 fine plus $10,000 for each additional 30 days of nondisclosure. Additionally, criminal penalties may also be assessed. A taxpayer who has a financial interest or signature authority over a foreign bank account whose value exceeds $10,000 during any time of the year must file FinCEN Form 114, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Account, also known as an FBAR. The penalty for not filing an FBAR is particularly steep: the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the account value; even imprisonment is possible. Form 8938 may also have to be filed.

Not only must foreign assets be reported, but also there is generally no protection from attachment by courts to satisfy judgments, since most countries of the world, including Switzerland, honor US court judgments. Assets can be protected, at least to some extent, if they are held in foreign trusts located in countries that do not recognize US court jurisdiction, notably the Cayman Islands, the Cook Islands, the Isle of Man, and Nevis. Generally, these asset havens do not assess income taxes on foreign accounts and they also protect the privacy of trust beneficiaries. However, US citizens will still have to pay taxes on any income earned from those assets, assuming that they report those assets as required under US tax law.

To protect assets from creditors, the trust must be irrevocable and discretionary, and the grantor cannot serve as trustee: otherwise, the court can compel the grantor to make distributions to creditors. Usually, the trustee is a resident of the foreign country where the trust is located. Even though the grantor does not serve as trustee, the grantor will still desire some measure of control, to change situs or to remove the trustee. Thus, most of these offshore trusts also have a trust protector that is separate from the trustee, who can replace the trustee or effect other changes to the trust.

A major drawback to foreign trusts is the legal and administrative expenses for setting up and managing the trust. Additionally, there is no guarantee that creditors will not be able to attach the assets, since a judge may hold the grantor in contempt of court. Although the grantor, per the trust document, cannot compel distribution, it can be argued that the grantor did set up the trust to avoid being compelled by a court to distribute funds to a creditor.

Medicaid Eligibility for Trust Beneficiaries

Sometimes trusts are used to support an individual in such a way so that they qualify for Medicaid—a federal program administered by the states that provides medical care for people who cannot afford it. Generally, eligibility for Medicaid will include trust income and principal to the extent that the beneficiary can access those funds. For instance, if the beneficiary is also the settlor, then all of the trust funds that are available to the settlor-beneficiary will be included as resources available to the Medicaid applicant.

If the beneficiary is not the settlor, then all the trust income and principal that the beneficiary should receive or could demand will be considered as part of resources available for her use. Hence, mandatory trusts that must pay a certain amount will be included in the beneficiary's income as well as income that must be paid out by a support trust for the support of the beneficiary. However, if the trust is irrevocable, then only those funds that are available to the beneficiary will be included in the beneficiary's assets, unless it is a testamentary trust created by the spouse's will or if the trust was created for a disabled person and the trust document specifies that the government will be paid for all unreimbursed medical expenses after the beneficiary dies.

Because the government is providing basic support for the individual, spendthrift clauses in discretionary trusts do not apply, and so could demand payment from the trust to the same extent that the beneficiary could. However, there is an exception for a supplemental needs trust that exists to provide support for medical services that the government does not cover.

529A Accounts

The tax code has been amended to allow a new type of account called the ABLE account or 529A account to help families save private funds to support individuals with disabilities. Based on the Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) Act of 2014 and modeled after 529 educational accounts, 529A accounts were designed to supplement — but not supplant — private insurance benefits, Medicaid, employment, and other sources. Previously, assets exceeding $2000 would disqualify the disabled from public benefits like Medicaid and Supplemental Social Security Income (SSI).

Cheaper and easier to set up than a special-needs trust, anyone can contribute, but total contributions cannot exceed $14,000 per year per beneficiary. Contributions are not tax-deductible, but earnings grow tax-free. However, any amount remaining in the account after the beneficiary's death is claimed by the state to reimburse it for Medicaid expenses.

Earnings are tax-exempt only if the program is established and maintained by a state or its instrumentality, and used to pay for qualified disability expenses, including:

Officers and employees who control the ABLE program must provide reports as required by the Secretary of the Treasury. A 10% tax penalty applies for:

ABLE accounts not exceeding $100,000 are disregarded for determining eligibility for means-tested federal programs, except for SSI payments for housing expenses. If an ABLE account exceeds $100,000, then SSI payments will be suspended while the ABLE account exceeds $100,000, but will not affect eligibility for Medicaid.

Funds placed in a 529A account by a debtor will be excluded from the debtor's bankruptcy estate if the account beneficiary is the debtor's child, grandchild, stepchild, or step grandchild, but only if the funds are not pledged to obtain credit, the account was not funded with excess contributions, and the funds do not exceed $6225 for a specified time.

While 529A accounts provide advantages for caring for the disabled, there are still additional benefits to having a special-needs trust, including:

However, only wealthier families can afford it, since special-needs trusts typically cost $2000-$5000 to set up, and professional trustees who usually manage investing, distributions, and other required duties generally charge 1% of the trust value. People of limited means may be able to use a pooled trust, where assets are commingled with assets of other families and managed by professionals. However, any assets remaining after the beneficiary dies may go to the state or to the organization managing the trust. Although a family member can manage a special-needs trust, many will find that they do not have the skill, inclination, or time to do a good job.

Source: H.R.647 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): ABLE Act of 2014 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress