Intestate Distribution Scheme: Descent and Distribution Statutes
There are several ways that property is transferred when you die: intestacy, nonprobate instruments, and by will.
The intestate distribution scheme is how a decedent's property is passed to heirs according to state law, when the decedent had property that was not transferred by nonprobate means or by will, or some or all the will was invalid, or part of the will fails.
The intestate distribution scheme depends on state statutory and judicial law, which varies greatly among jurisdictions. What property falls to intestacy is also determined by the jurisdiction, especially in regard to ambiguities in the will, failed gifts, and other defects in the will or even in nonprobate instruments.
Intestacy is the Norm
Most people fail to pass property either by nonprobate means or through a will; hence, the property is distributed according to the state's descent and distribution law. Property also falls to intestacy if it was not included in a valid will or the will suffered other defects, such as a failed gift or ambiguities.
Heirs, Heirs Apparent, Legatees, and Expectancies
The people who receive the decedent's property under intestacy are called heirs, but before the death of the property owner, they are only heirs apparent since an heir must survive the decedent, and who remains alive to receive the property can only be known after the property owner dies. If the property is transferred by will, then the beneficiaries are called legatees, but not heirs.
An expectancy of an heir apparent is the expectation to receive property from the property owner after her death. Most children, for instance, expect to receive their parents' property after the death of both parents.
An expectancy is not a property interest because the heir apparent must survive the property owner, or the owner could devise the property to another through a will or transfer the property inter vivos.
Because an expectancy is not a property interest, it is not transferable. However, if the heir apparent agrees to transfer the property for an adequate present consideration, then most courts will enforce the agreement.
Typical Intestate Distribution
If a decedent died intestate, then the decedent's property is distributed according to the relevant state's descent and distribution statute. For personal property, the relevant state is the decedent's domicile at the time of death; for real property, the state in which the property is located.
Although there is a large variation in states' intestacy laws, they all have common elements, most notably, who inherits and what percentage. Another common feature is that the descent and distribution is tiered, so that if there are any takers at any 1 tier below the spouse, everyone in that tier takes equally all the remaining property and no one in lower tiers takes anything.
The surviving spouse may take everything, if the decedent had no surviving issue or the issue are also issue of the surviving spouse and the decedent had no surviving parent. Otherwise, the surviving spouse takes most or all the property depending on whom else is closely related to the decedent who is still alive.
All property not passing to the spouse passes to the following in equal proportions:
- Issue (all descendants)
- Issue of parents
- Issue of grandparents
If there is no one in the groups listed above, then the property passes to the next-of-kin by the degree of relationship. However, there are limits to the next-of-kin relationship, which is defined by statute, because, if you consider more remote ancestors, we are all, at some degree, related. If there are no heirs, then all the property escheats to the state.
The Uniform Probate Code (UPC §§2-102 to 2-105) takes a similar approach. However, more of the property goes to the spouse than under most state statutes, and there is no distribution to the next-of-kin under the UPC, but, instead, escheats to the state. The distribution to grandparents or issue of grandparents also differs slightly from most statutes.
If the decedent and surviving spouse live in a community property state, then the community property is divided in half, with the decedent's estate receiving half and the surviving spouse, half. If the decedent died testate, then his half of the community property is distributed according to his will. However, if he died intestate, then his half of the property is distributed according to the state's descent and distribution statute. In most cases of intestacy, all the property goes to the surviving spouse.
Real estate located in other states will be subject to the laws of that state, which may affect the rights of surviving spouses and the rules of intestacy.
The intestate distribution scheme depends on relationships. When a person dies intestate, there are usually many claimants, sometimes hundreds or even thousands. Hence, evidence must be gathered to distinguish the true relatives from the fakers. Birth certificates were traditionally used, and still are, to prove relationships. Nowadays, relationships can be proven with DNA testing, using samples collected while the person was still alive or collected from the dead body. DNA samples can even be collected from personal belongings of the deceased. However, to serve as adequate evidence in court, a documented chain of custody must be maintained, so that it can be proven that the DNA was not tampered with.
Intestacy Enters the Modern Era: Proving Relationships through DNA Testing
In times past, wealthy people who died without wills, and especially without apparent heirs, often invited hundreds or even thousands of people to claim to be relatives of the deceased. Prince Rogers Nelson, otherwise known simply as Prince, a successful musician, died on April 21, 2016 from a fentanyl overdose, leaving an estate worth almost $300 million, but no heir apparent. He left no will, no spouse, no children, no surviving parents.
Since he lived in Minnesota, the intestate rules of Minnesota apply, and like most states, the property is divided among the closest relatives. Consequently, hundreds of people claimed to be one of his relatives. Anticipating such a scenario, his DNA was preserved before his cremation, so anyone who claimed to be his relative must pay several hundred dollars for a DNA testing kit, which would probably dissuade fakers. Source: Another lesson from Prince's death: You may want to bank your DNA - MarketWatch
DNA from a living person can be tested from a sample collected from a swap of the mouth, so it may be prudent for you to keep a sample of your own DNA, in case someone claims to be your child, or if there is a possibility that an unknown child of yours will be born after your death.
Same-Sex Marriage, Civil Unions, and Domestic Partnerships
A partner in a gay or lesbian relationship is not related by blood and, although more states recognize marriage between 2 partners of the same sex, some do not. Some states do recognize domestic relationships, so domestic partners are included in the intestate descent and distribution scheme in those states. The modern trend in law is to recognize gay and lesbian relationships, and, no doubt, all states and jurisdictions will eventually treat domestic partnerships as marriages.
What evidence should be presented that would cause a domestic partner to be treated as a surviving spouse under intestacy laws in those jurisdictions that allow it? Generally, if domestic partners shared a common household in a marriage-like relationship, then this is a good indication that they were domestic partners. However, to remove any ambiguity, some have suggested using a registry where one could simply list his or her partner in the registry.
However, in 1996, the Defense of Marriage Act was passed, which consists of 2 parts:
- 1 U.S.C. §7: "In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word â€œmarriageâ€ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word â€œspouseâ€ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife."
- Title 28, Chapter 115, §1738C: "No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship."
Consequently, same-sex partners could not enjoy the same Social Security, tax, and welfare benefits that traditionally married members of the opposite sex enjoy nor do states that do not recognize a marriage between members of the same sex need to recognize such a marriage under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution. However, DOMA was overturned by the Supreme Court on 6/26/2013.
No doubt, domestic partners will eventually have all the same rights and privileges that traditionally married couples enjoy, but, in the meantime, through the use of wills and will substitutes, such as inter vivos trusts, a domestic partner can pass property to his or her partner regardless of the jurisdiction.
Same-Sex Marriage Is Now Legal in All 50 States
On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that "same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry", thereby legalizing same-sex marriage throughout the country. Henceforth, they will enjoy all the benefits (and drawbacks) of marriage.